Khalil, A. S. & Collins, J. J. Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 367–379 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pickar-Oliver, A. & Gersbach, C. A. The next generation of CRISPR–Cas technologies and applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 490–507 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bikard, D. et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR–Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7429–7437 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013).
Google Scholar
Abudayyeh, O. O. et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science 353, aaf5573 (2016).
Google Scholar
Abudayyeh, O. O. et al. RNA targeting with CRISPR–Cas13. Nature 550, 280–284 (2017).
Google Scholar
Aman, R. et al. RNA virus interference via CRISPR/Cas13a system in plants. Genome Biol 19, 1 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tieu, V. et al. A versatile CRISPR–Cas13d platform for multiplexed transcriptomic regulation and metabolic engineering in primary human T cells. Cell 187, 1278–1295 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cox, D. B. T. et al. RNA editing with CRISPR–Cas13. Science 358, 1019–1027 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Programmable RNA editing with compact CRISPR–Cas13 systems from uncultivated microbes. Nat. Methods 18, 499–506 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, L.-Z. et al. Dynamic imaging of RNA in living cells by CRISPR–Cas13 systems. Mol. Cell 76, 981–997 (2019).
Google Scholar
Meeske, A. J., Nakandakari-Higa, S. & Marraffini, L. A. Cas13-induced cellular dormancy prevents the rise of CRISPR-resistant bacteriophage. Nature 570, 241–245 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, K. et al. CRISPR/Cas13d-mediated microbial RNA knockdown. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 856 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jain, I. et al. tRNA anticodon cleavage by target-activated CRISPR–Cas13a effector. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl0164 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tong, H. et al. High-fidelity Cas13 variants for targeted RNA degradation with minimal collateral effects. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 108–119 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, F. et al. A strategy for Cas13 miniaturization based on the structure and AlphaFold. Nat. Commun. 14, 5545 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, P. et al. Allele-specific suppression of variant MHC with high-precision RNA nuclease CRISPR–Cas13d prevents hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 150, 283–298 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gama-Castro, S. et al. RegulonDB version 9.0: high-level integration of gene regulation, coexpression, motif clustering and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D133–D143 (2016).
Google Scholar
Caspi, R. et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes—a 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D445–D453 (2020).
Google Scholar
Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152, 1173–1183 (2013).
Google Scholar
Larson, M. H. et al. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2180–2196 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dong, C., Fontana, J., Patel, A., Carothers, J. M. & Zalatan, J. G. Synthetic CRISPR–Cas gene activators for transcriptional reprogramming in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 9, 2489 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, G. et al. Tunable translation-level CRISPR interference by dCas13 and engineered gRNA in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 15, 5319 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cardiff, R. A., Faulkner, I. D., Beall, J. G., Carothers, J. M. & Zalatan, J. G. CRISPR–Cas tools for simultaneous transcription & translation control in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 5406–5419 (2024).
Google Scholar
Charles, E. J. et al. Engineering improved Cas13 effectors for targeted post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.26.445687 (2021).
Otoupal, P. B., Cress, B. F., Doudna, J. A. & Schoeniger, J. S. CRISPR–RNAa: targeted activation of translation using dCas13 fusions to translation initiation factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 8986–8998 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, X. et al. CRISPR/Cas13X-assisted programmable and multiplexed translation regulation for controlled biosynthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkae1293 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hayes, V. M. et al. RNA-mediated CRISPR–Cas13 inhibition through crRNA structural mimicry. Science 388, 387–391 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, S. & Voigt, C. A. Engineered dCas9 with reduced toxicity in bacteria: implications for genetic circuit design. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 11115–11125 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huang, H.-H. et al. dCas9 regulator to neutralize competition in CRISPRi circuits. Nat. Commun. 12, 1692 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kiani, S. et al. Cas9 gRNA engineering for genome editing, activation and repression. Nat. Methods 12, 1051–1054 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kuo, H.-C., Prupes, J., Chou, C.-W. & Finkelstein, I. J. Massively parallel profiling of RNA-targeting CRISPR–Cas13d. Nat. Commun. 15, 498 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chan, L. Y., Mugler, C. F., Heinrich, S., Vallotton, P. & Weis, K. Non-invasive measurement of mRNA decay reveals translation initiation as the major determinant of mRNA stability. eLife 7, e32536 (2018).
Google Scholar
Celesnik, H., Deana, A. & Belasco, J. G. Initiation of RNA decay in Escherichia coli by 5′ pyrophosphate removal. Mol. Cell 27, 79–90 (2007).
Google Scholar
Laalami, S., Zig, L. & Putzer, H. Initiation of mRNA decay in bacteria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1799–1828 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gyorgy, A. et al. Isocost lines describe the cellular economy of genetic circuits. Biophys. J. 109, 639–646 (2015).
Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Huang, H.-H., Jiménez, J. I. & Del Vecchio, D. Resource competition shapes the response of genetic circuits. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1263–1272 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jones, R. D. et al. An endoribonuclease-based feedforward controller for decoupling resource-limited genetic modules in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 5690 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shi, P. et al. Collateral activity of the CRISPR/RfxCas13d system in human cells. Commun. Biol. 6, 334 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-H. et al. Advances in engineering the production of the natural red pigment lycopene: a systematic review from a biotechnology perspective. J. Adv. Res. 46, 31–47 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alper, H., Jin, Y.-S., Moxley, J. & Stephanopoulos, G. Identifying gene targets for the metabolic engineering of lycopene biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 7, 155–164 (2005).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli using CRISPR–Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metab. Eng. 31, 13–21 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Sun, J., Yang, Q. & Yang, J. Metabolic engineering Escherichia coli for the production of lycopene. Molecules 25, 3136 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ko, S. C. & Woo, H. M. CRISPR–dCas13a system for programmable small RNAs and polycistronic mRNA repression in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 492–506 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boronat, A. & Rodríguez-Concepción, M. in Biotechnology of Isoprenoids (eds Schrader, J. & Bohlmann, J.) (Springer, 2015).
Bot, J. F., van der Oost, J. & Geijsen, N. The double life of CRISPR–Cas13. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 78, 102789 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kelley, C. P., Haerle, M. C. & Wang, E. T. Negative autoregulation mitigates collateral RNase activity of repeat-targeting CRISPR–Cas13d in mammalian cells. Cell Rep. 40, 111226 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wan, Y., Helenek, C., Coraci, D. & Balázsi, G. Optimizing a CRISPR–Cas13d gene circuit for tunable target RNA downregulation with minimal collateral RNA cutting. ACS Synth. Biol. 13, 3212–3230 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hart, S. K. et al. Precise RNA targeting with CRISPR–Cas13d. Nat. Biotechnol. 44, 64–69 (2025).
Google Scholar
Calvert, R. W. et al. Structures of tRNA-bound CRISPR–Cas13 reveal universal HEPN RNase mechanisms. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.03.690598 (2025).
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Depardieu, F. & Bikard, D. Gene silencing with CRISPRi in bacteria and optimization of dCas9 expression levels. Methods 172, 61–75 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).
Google Scholar
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).
Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Google Scholar
